Stuard v. Bean
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Petitioner brings this special action, alleging that the refusal of the respondent court to decide a jurisdictional issue in a child custody case constitutes a failure to perform its duty as required by law. We find the use of special action proceedings particularly appropriate in this case since the welfare of children is involved and there is no remedy by appeal. We therefore assume jurisdiction and grant relief.
The pertinent facts are as follows. On February 8, 1975, James Ziglar delivered his two minor daughters into the custody of his mother, the petitioner, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. BarlowArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Lorenz v. RoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Wilky v. WinnArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Johnson v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Brown v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Child Safety v. BeeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Reed v. HighSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Reed v. HighSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978