Legal Opinion

Rose v. Saif Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 2005No. 03-03941; A123948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant filed a claim, and employer accepted it. Thereafter, claimant filed a claim for a new medical condition, but employer neither accepted nor denied that claim. Instead, employer sent what has come to be known as an “encompassed condition letter” that stated, in essence, that the new medical condition already had been accepted. Claimant was not satisfied with that answer, given that the specificity of an employer’s acceptance can affect the rating of a claim at closure. She challenged the lawfulness of employer’s response, arguing that pertinent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. 2606 Building v. Mica or I Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Troupe v. Labor Ready, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Grabhorn, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Thunderbird Hotels, LLC v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. LeFave v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API