Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 25, 1937No. [No. 29, April Term, 1937.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a directed verdict for the defendant, in an action brought in the Baltimore City Court by Helen Chalmers against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, to recover for injuries said to have been caused by a fall over a carton of canned goods, placed in an aisle in a store operated by the defendant, where she was present as a patron and business visitor. The single question submitted is whether the evidence was legally sufficient to permit a recovery.

There was in the' case evidence legally sufficient to permit the following finding of fact: At about 5…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Greene v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Moore v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Dickey v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Eyerly v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  5. Grzboski v. Bernheimer-Leader StoresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Shoppers Food Warehouse MD Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Evans v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Mondawmin Corporation v. KresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Lee v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Provost v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API