Legal Opinion

Provost v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1963No. 872PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

154 So.2d 597 (1963)

Mrs. C. Arthur (Naomi Nalty) PROVOST et vir, Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

No. 872.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 18, 1963.

Voorhies, Labbe, Voorhies, Fontenot & Leonard, by J. Winston Fontenot, Lafayette, for defendants-appellants.

Provost & Ernest, by George D. Ernest, Jr., New Iberia, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before TATE, SAVOY and HOOD, JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

This is a tort action instituted by Mr. and Mrs. C. Arthur Provost against The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company and its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Knight v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Chalmers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Lejeune v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNTY CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Ransom v. Kreeger Store, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dever v. GEORGE THERIOR'S INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Hay v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANYLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Broussard v. National Food Stores of La., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Robnett v. Great American Insurance Co. of NYLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Hanford v. Jan C. Uiterwyk CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API