Legal Opinion
UNITED SECURITIES CORPORATION v. Verene
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 1963No. 3243PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge.
Appellant sued appellees, husband and wife, for a balance due on a promissory note executed by them under a contract for the purchase of an automobile on time. In defense, appellees claimed payment in full. 1 Sitting without a jury, the trial judge found for appellees. This appeal ensued.
Appellant, engaged in the finance business, bought the conditional sale contract and note from Auto Discount Corporation. The contract indicated a total sales price of $1,745, less a cash payment of $450, leaving a net balance of $1,295, to which were added the cost of collision…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Parker v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Hardison v. Shirlington Trust CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- District of Columbia v. Chevrah Tifereth IsraelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Branch v. BranchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gause v. C.t. Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Sponaugle v. Universal Acceptance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967