Gause v. C.t. Management, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Appellant Mabel Gause (“the tenant”) challenges orders of the trial court, sitting in the Landlord and Tenant Branch, denying her motion to be restored to possession and her motion for reconsideration. She contends that delivery to appellee C.T. Management, Inc. (“the landlord”) of a Department of Human Services’ (“DHS”) letter confirming an Emergency Assistance Services (“EAS”) payment constitutes sufficient tender for purposes of redeeming possession of her apartment under the Trans-Lux1 doctrine. We disagree and affirm.
*436I.
On June 1, 1992, the landlord filed a complaint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Dameron v. Capitol House Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- American Continental Insurance Co. v. PooyaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. OxendineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. OxendineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994