General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank of Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentMyers, Associate Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, which is based upon a holding that Credit Corporation’s signature at the bottom of a proffered one-line acceptance form bars Credit Corporation from asserting a cause of action which it could otherwise assert against the bank. While under certain circumstances acceptance of an assignment may bar a debtor from asserting against an assignee claims which he has against an assignor, I do not believe those circumstances exist in the present case.
The cases quoted in the majority opinion employ two different theories to reach the conclusion that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Maryland Cooperative Milk Producers, Inc. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Hardison v. Shirlington Trust CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Kanawha Valley Bank v. Nello L. Teer Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1955
- UNITED SECURITIES CORPORATION v. VereneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.