Legal Opinion · Dissent

General Electric Credit Corp. v. Security Bank of Washington

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1968No. 4051Published

1DissentMyers, Associate Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, which is based upon a holding that Credit Corporation’s signature at the bottom of a proffered one-line acceptance form bars Credit Corporation from asserting a cause of action which it could otherwise assert against the bank. While under certain circumstances acceptance of an assignment may bar a debtor from asserting against an assignee claims which he has against an assignor, I do not believe those circumstances exist in the present case.

The cases quoted in the majority opinion employ two different theories to reach the conclusion that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker v. SagerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Maryland Cooperative Milk Producers, Inc. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Hardison v. Shirlington Trust CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Kanawha Valley Bank v. Nello L. Teer Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1955
  5. UNITED SECURITIES CORPORATION v. VereneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API