Legal Opinion

United States v. Bierley

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 18, 1986No. ACM S27035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

FORAY, Senior Judge:

Appellant is contesting his special court-martial conviction for drug abuse by contending:

I

THE COURT-MARTIAL WAS WITHOUT JURISDICTION BECAUSE LT COL [H], THE CONVENING AUTHORITY, WAS NOT PROPERLY APPOINTED TO COMMAND.

But, if he was properly appointed to command, then:

II

THE ACTION OF THE CONVENING AUTHORITY IS INVALID, AS THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT COLONEL [W] WAS PROPERLY IN COMMAND.

At the trial of this case, during arraignment, trial counsel announced that the charges were, in fact, referred to trial by Lieutenant Colonel H.1 A copy of a special order announcing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. KugimaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. O'ConnorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. JetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. PazdernikU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MinerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. MinerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API