Legal Opinion

United States v. Miner

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 14, 1986No. ACM S27028Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

FORAY, Senior Judge:

Appellant is attacking the jurisdiction of the special court-martial which tried and convicted him1 by assigning the following error for our resolution:

WHETHER COLONEL [W] WAS NOT THE COMMANDER OF THE 92ND COMBAT SUPPORT GROUP, AND COULD NOT THEREFORE, TAKE ANY ACTION AS THE SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL CONVENING AUTHORITY, AFTER 26 JANUARY 1986.

The facts necessary to the understanding of the assigned error are brief. Colonel W had assumed command of the 92nd Combat Support Group (hereinafter, the Group) on 9 August 1985. During the period from 26 through 31 January 1986,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. BlairU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. CurtinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. JetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. PazdernikU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API