Legal Opinion
Bischoff v. Wm. Schnepp, Inc.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided May 29, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKoch, J.
This is a motion to set aside the service of a summons on the ground that the court has not acquired jurisdiction of the person of the defendant.
The summons was served under the provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law by service upon the Secretary of State at Albany, and by mailing a copy to the defendant at its address in New Jersey.
The defendant contends that the service is void because, (1) Section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law does not apply to a corporation; (2) service of process of the City Court on the Secretary *294of State at Albany is unconstitutional as being…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Historical Society, Inc. v. GlennNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Matter of Decker v. Pouvailsmith Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Bessan v. Public Service Co-ordinated TransportCity of New York Municipal Court · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Brown v. Cleveland Tractor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Producers' & Refiners' Corp. v. Illinois Cent. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Maguire v. ReissCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
- United Communications Corp. v. 1st Tee, Inc.Watertown City Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.