Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cleveland Tractor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 37,294PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

I cannot concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Weadock.. Defendant is an Ohio corporation, manufacturing and selling tractors. Charles H. Wilt was its service mechanic, employed by it to travel in several States and make needed repairs and adjustments on tractors. Wilt was under orders of the company but could travel by train or his own automobile at his pleasure and, when using his own car, he was allowed seven cents a mile as expense money.

The action is brought for damages resulting from a collision between Wilt’s car, while driven by him on defendant’s business, and plaintiff’s car. Service…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Tier v. SellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Poti v. New England Road MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Bessan v. Public Service Co-ordinated TransportCity of New York Municipal Court · 1929
  4. Day v. BushLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Gesell v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Jones v. PeblerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Carlson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  4. Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bowman v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API