Legal Opinion

Smith v. Starnes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 12, 1986No. 424PA85PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

This cause of action arose out of a 7 August 1980 automobile accident in which plaintiffs intestate was killed instantly and plaintiffs vehicle was severely damaged. Suit was duly commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of a sum*614mons on 6 August 1982.1 On 13 August 1982, Mr. Armentrout, plaintiffs counsel, mailed the original summons and a copy of the complaint to defendant’s counsel and requested that counsel have defendant sign an enclosed acceptance of service. On 23 September 1982, defendant’s counsel returned the complaint and summons by letter and stated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estrada v. BurnhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. United States v. American Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  3. Adams v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. McClure v. . FellowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Deaton v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. CBP Resources, Inc. v. Ingredient Resource Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  3. Sellers v. High Point Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Smith v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Robinson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API