Legal Opinion

Adams v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 8420SC569PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

In the only assignment of error presented on appeal, plaintiff asserts that the motions for summary judgment were erroneously granted. Plaintiff contends that the applicable three year statute of limitations, G.S. 1-52(5), was tolled when the action was commenced by the filing of her complaint on 5 July 1979. Defendants assert that since plaintiff made no attempt to deliver a copy of the complaint and summons, after issuance, to the sheriff for service, that the original summons expired and that every later endorsement simply constituted the filing of this action as of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Congleton v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Brantley v. DunstanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Estrada v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Smith v. StarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Smith v. StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Smith v. StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API