Legal Opinion

McClure v. . Fellows

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants entered a special appearance and moved to vacate the attachment and dismiss the action upon the ground that no summons had issued, and that the levy of the attachment was void and of no effect. His Honor overruled the motion, and defendants excepted and appealed.

From the facts agreed it appears that the summons was filled out and signed by the clerk, but never issued to the sheriff or to any one for him, but remained in the office of the clerk. An order of publication of the summons and of the warrant of attachment was duly signed by the clerk, and the same was duly published.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Webster v. . SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Etheridge v. . WoodleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Marsh v. . Williams and BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  4. Fleming v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Middleton v. DuffySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marrison v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Williams v. BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Smith v. StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Deaton v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Smith v. StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API