State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Krouse
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In Dayton Newspapers v. Dayton (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 107, 110, the court stated “[W]e believe that doubt should be resolved in favor of disclosure of records held by governmental units. Aside from the exceptions mentioned in B. C. 149.43, records should be available to the public unless the custodian of such records can show a legal prohibition to disclosure.” See, also, State, ex rel. Beacon Journal Pub. Co., v. Andrews (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 283.
The respondents agree that these forms are “required to be kept” within the meaning of B. C. 149.43, but they assert that the forms are not public…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Outlet Communications, Inc. v. Lancaster Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. RauchOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. TelbLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.