Legal Opinion

Hill v. Huston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1945No. Docket No. 62, Calendar No. 43,020Published

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This is an appeal by defendant John C. Huston from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Matthew Hill for possession of certain premises, entered upon the verdict of the jury, determining defendant to be guilty of withholding possession from plaintiff. This determination in the circuit court was upon an appeal from a like determination by a jury in the circuit court commissioner’s court.

The testimony discloses that Huston had been a lessee under a written lease of premises located at 1486 East Milwaukee avenue in Detroit, which contained 32 rooms, divided into housekeeping apartments. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arrand v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Barkman v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Rice v. Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lewis v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Teft v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API