Legal Opinion
Grywczynski v. Shasta Beverages, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 23, 1984No. C-83-5717 SAWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WEIGEL, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Chester G. Grywzcynski and Frederick J. Ralston brought this action against their former employer, Shasta Beverages, Inc. (“Shasta”), its parent corporation, Consolidated Foods Corporation (“Consolidated”), and the Consolidated Foods Pension Plan (“Plan”), alleging, inter alia, that they were discharged wrongfully and in violation of both Section 510 of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140, and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robert Rodriguez v. Airborne ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Salgado v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Allen v. American Home Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
- Rauh v. CoyneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Everett Associates, Inc. v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.