Johnson v. Salsbury
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.
The demurrer admits the facts alleged in the complaint to be true, and asserts as a legal proposition that the admitted facts do not reveal the commission of an actionable wrong by defendant against plain tiffs. It is self-evident that the defendant has done the plaintiffs no .actionable injury by buying the stock if E. Y. Johnson bad authority to sell it to him. For this reason, the appeal presents this single query: When the factual averments of the complaint are accepted as true, do they show that E. V. Johnson bad no lawful power to sell the stock to the defendant?
The plaintiffs contend…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cross v. United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Smith v. . Central Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Hoglan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Rosenbaum v. GarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
- Fernald v. First Church of ChristSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Carolina v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Adcock v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.