Legal Opinion

In re S.M.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 30, 1994No. 93-225PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The Commissioner of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) and juveniles S.M. and M.M. appeal from an order of the Rutland Family Court denying SRS’s petition to terminate the residual parental rights (TPR) of the juveniles’ parents. Appellants raise three claims on appeal: (1) in every dispositional review the court must consider the factors enumerated in 38 V.S.A. § 5540, even where the court does not find a substantial change of material circumstances; (2) the court erroneously concluded that no substantial change of circumstances existed as to father; and (3) the court erred by not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re B.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. In re H.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. In re D. P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  4. In re M.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. In re D.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re A.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API