Legal Opinion
Searls v. Standard Accident Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 27, 1944PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiffs, a minor and her father, are the holders of judgments against the defendant O’Brien for bodily injuries and for consequential damages, respectively, arising from her being struck by an automobile on a public way in Woburn in this Commonwealth. These bills in equity under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 113, and c. 214, § 3 (10), are to reach and apply in satisfaction of their judgments the obligation of the defendant insurance company, hereinafter called the company, under an automobile liability policy. The company’s answers set up that the policy contained the following…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- S. & E. Motor Hire Corp. v. New York Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Seltzer v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. KellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Salonen v. PaanenenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Magoun v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Canal Insurance v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.