Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Valleau

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1925No. 14537PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This action is for damages in the sum of $558.11, based upon fraud in selling plaintiff two i( ts. being 15 and 16 of block 7, of South Park addition to Oklahoma City, which were 25 foot lots, and representing that the two lots were 67 feet wide; that is, each lot was 33% feet wide. The petition alleged that plaintiff relied on the representation of the defendant and his agent that the lots were 67 feet wide instead of 59 feet, and that he paid $1,700 cash, and gave his note, secured by mortgage on the lots with improvements, for $500, the balance •due to be paid…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Ashton v. Board of Com'rs of Murray CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stafford v. McDougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Critchlow v. BaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Bingenheimer v. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Reed v. Washington Fidelity Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API