Legal Opinion

H.B. Zachry Co. v. Gonzalez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1993No. D-2601PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original mandamus proceeding, H.B. Zachry Company seeks to compel the Honorable Charles Gonzalez to set aside his order excluding witnesses pursuant to rule 215(5) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The witnesses were excluded because they were not fully identified in answer to interrogatories of the defendant, Bristol Metals, Inc., more than thirty days before the date of trial as required by rule 166b(6). Tex.R.Civ.P. 166b(6). Since the ruling, Judge Gonzalez removed the trial setting to a date more than thirty days from the date of the trial from which the witnesses were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Human Services v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center v. Apodaca, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SpeciaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Williams Distributing Co. v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Republic Parking System of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API