Armeny v. Madson & Buck Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Alonzo K. Vickers, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1903.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stein
First. The contention of appellee that the assignments of error are not sufficiently specific is not well taken. Many Illinois cases are cited, but they only hold that it is not enough to assign error; it must also be pointed out and argued in the brief, otherwise it is waived. In the absence of an order requiring them to do so, it was not necessary for appellants to state any specific grounds for their motion for a new trial, and the failure to state them cannot be urged in the reviewing court. O. O. & F. R. V. R. R. Co. v. McMath, 91 Ill. 104.
Second. In connection with the proof that it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ottawa, Oswego & Fox River Valley R. R. v. McMathIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Jordan, Marsh & Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Bluegrass Cordage Co. v. Luthy & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Trigg v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
- Capen v. De Steiger Glass Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hubshman v. Louis Keer Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Martin v. NeerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Black Diamond Fuel Co. v. Illinois Fuel & Phosphate Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
- Match Corp. of America v. Acme Match Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Staver Carriage Co. v. American & British Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.