Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Prieto

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Bexar County Court; P. H. Shook, Judge. Action by Roy Campbell against Antonio Prieto. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtEly, J.

Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the county court, and will be so denominated in this court, instituted this suit to recover $509.20, alleged to be a balance due on 20 • ear loads of hay which plaintiff had sold to defendant, but which the latter had refused to receive, and plaintiff sold it and credited defendant with the amount realized from the sale. The cause was tried by jury, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant.

[1] The first assignment of error claims that the court erred in refusing to allow J. B. McFarland, the agent of plaintiff, to testify that he authorized…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McNeillTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. T. & St. Louis E. E. Co. v. JarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Styles v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Kolp v. SpechtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Rivers v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Adams v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Gonzalez v. DavilaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Adams v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API