Legal Opinion
Smith v. Obama
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 3, 2014No. Case No. 2:13-CV-257-BLWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it plaintiff Smith’s motion for injunctive relief and defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Court heard oral argument on May 14, 2014, and took the motions under advisement. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss and deny Smith’s motion for injunctive relief.
BACKGROUND
The Fourth Amendment protects the right of privacy by forbidding unreasonable searches and seizures. With few ex7 ceptions, a citizen cannot be searched in violation of her reasonable expectation of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- State v. EarlsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Klayman v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. ClapperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Agility Public Warehousing Company K.S.C. v. National Security AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. United States National Security AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- ACLU v. ClapperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015