Legal Opinion

State v. Earls

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 18, 2013PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner

Advances in technology offer great benefits to society in many areas. At the same time, they can pose significant risks to individual privacy rights. This case highlights both principles as we consider recent strides in cell-phone technology. New improvements not only expand our ability to communicate with one another and access the Internet, but the cell phones we carry can also serve as powerful tracking devices able to pinpoint our movements with remarkable precision and accuracy.

In this appeal, we consider whether people have a constitutional right of privacy in cell-phone location…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. State v. Xiomara Gonzales(075911)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. State v. Amir Randolph(076506) (Hudson County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API