Legal Opinion

Continental Coatings Corp. v. Metco, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 6, 1970No. 68 C 1320PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants’ Motion Under Rule 45

MAROVITZ, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement action in which defendants are allegedly directly and contributorily infringing, as well as threatening and inducing infringement of a patent now owned by plaintiff. United States Letters Patent No. 2,904,-449, entitled “Method and Composition for Flame Spraying,” was originally issued to the Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, now known as the IIT Research Institute (IITRI). Complaint If 6. Subsequently, it was assigned to plaintiff. Id.

With…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooney v. Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Hogan v. ZletzDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Sperry Rand Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1968
  5. Fastener Corp. v. Spotnails, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Badman v. StarkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Mortgage Information Services, Inc. v. KitchensDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
  3. Hasbro, Inc. v. SerafinoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  4. Wimes v. Eaton Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  5. United States v. SchmidtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API