Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Zletz
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 30, 1967No. 6475-CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Background Facts
I
This is an ancillary proceeding under Title 35, U.S.C., Section 24, for production of documents pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., by Natta et al assignor to Montecatini Societá Generate per LTndustria Mineraria e Chinica and Montecatini Edison S.p.A. (hereinafter-called Natta et al), the senior party in Interference No. 89,634. Natta et aL has an Italian application filing date of' June 8, 1954. The Interference action now pending before the Board of Patent Interference of the United States Patent. Office involves three…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Jesse Ray PipkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Hewes v. LangstonMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- In Re Natta, Movant, in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta Natta, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.