Mullen v. Renzleman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by E. Renzleman against J. S. Mullen. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
Defendant in error originally instituted this action by filing in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, at Ardmore, his petition to recover from plaintiff in error damages in the sum of $365, for alleged injuries received by his stock from a fence constructed by plaintiff in error. Upon the admission of the state, the cause was transferred, under the provisions of the Enabling Act and the Schedule to the Constitution, to the district court of Carter county, where a trial to a jury was had, and judgment rendered in favor of defendant in error for his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Worthington v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Clark v. Haworth, School Trustee of Monroe School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Sisk v. CrumpIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hurd v. LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Adair v. McFarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spurrier Lumber Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Garretson v. AveryWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
- Mullen v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911