Legal Opinion

State v. Champagne

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 2002No. 27037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Chief Judge.

Terena Champagne appeals from her judgments of conviction for possession of methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia. Champagne argues the district court erred when it denied her motion to suppress and found that the search of her vehicle was a lawful search incident to arrest. We affirm.

Champagne was driving to a grocery store at approximately 3 a.m. when an officer traveling in the opposite direction passed her and noticed that her front license plate was missing. The officer, realizing that the state of Idaho requires all vehicles to display both a front and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. ScheversIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LaMayIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hoskins v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Champagne v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API