Legal Opinion

Zeek v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1983No. 82-AB-1731; A26613PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*517NEWMAN, J.

Petitioner has been a school secretary at Molalla Grade School since 1976. She sought unemployment compensation benefits for the period that she was unemployed between the 1981-82 and 1982-83 academic years. The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denied her claim. We affirm.

Molalla School District No. 35 operated its school on a 12-month academic year. Petitioner worked 12 months each year. In May, 1982, the voters defeated the district’s proposed budget and, as a consequence, the district adopted the traditional 10-month academic year. The district’s superintendent sent petitioner a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mallon v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Kokotan v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friedlander v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Hayes v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Ortiz v. New Mexico Employment Security DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Goeller v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Redmond v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API