Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. New Mexico Employment Security Department
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1986No. 9071PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SANDRA A. GRISHAM, District Judge, by Order of Designation.
Ramona Ortiz, Mary Torivio, and Elizabeth Garcia (claimants) appeal from the district court’s affirmance of the denial of unemployment compensation benefits by the New Mexico Employment Security Department (ESD). Claimants were employed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs as educational aides at the Sky City Community School for the 1983-1984 school year, and had been similarly employed since the early 1970’s.
In prior years, claimants had been “furloughed” in the summer from approximately one week after school let out to one week…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Wilson v. Employment Security CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Leissring v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Conwell v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oil Transport Co. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Goeller v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Goeller v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988