Rumbold v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. Smith v Insurance Go., 64 Mo. 330; Insurance Go. v. Stratham, 93 U. S. 24 ; Hoioland v. Insurance Go., 121 Mass. 499 ; Insurance Go. v. Twining, 12 Kan. 475. Laubach v. Laubach, 73 Pa. St. 387 ; Insurance Go. v. Schultz, 82 Pa. St. 46 ; Tyler v. Bailey, 71 111. 38 ; McKee v. Insurance Go., 28 Mo. 383.
1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.
This is an action upon a policy of life insurance. The plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that he had paid three annual premiums under the policy, and then, being unable to pay any more, that he had, as prescribed by the policy, offered to surrender it, and had demanded a paid-up policy for the amount provided for in such contingency. The defendant admitted the issue of the policy sued on, and *72that it was agreed thatif default should be made in the payment of any premium after two annual premiums had been paid, it would, upon surrender of the policy sued on and the unredeemed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- McKee v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Smith v. Charter Oak Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Mound City Mutual Life Insurance v. TwiningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. NeeleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Farrow v. State Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Lewis v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Tutt v. Covenant Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Suess v. Imperial Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.