Legal Opinion

T.H. v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1990No. 88-208PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant, T.H., appeals from the determination that her child was a neglected child pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-2301(9)(B) and (C) (1989 Repl.) on the ground that the statutory scheme violated her constitutional right to due process. Specifically, she maintains that D.C.Code § 16-2317 (1989 Repl.) is unconstitutional because it fails to require proof of neglect by clear and convincing evidence, that D.C.Code § 2-1355 (1988 Repl.) permits use of medical evidence in violation of her right of privacy, and that the statutory procedures are generally violative of her right of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re Ko. W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. In re O.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In re A.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. In re D.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API