Legal Opinion

In re A.M.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1991No. 88-750PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant S.M. appeals from a trial court order revoking protective supervision of her child, A.M., the result of which was to return A.M. to a foster home. S.M. contends that the court lacked authority to revoke its previously entered protective supervision order. We disagree and therefore affirm the order under review.

I

In October 1983 the District of Columbia filed a petition in the Superior Court alleging that A.M., then six years old, was a neglected child.1 The petition alleged that A.M.’s mother, S.M., had been sentenced in August 1983 to one year in jail for drug…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Willcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. In re S.K.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In re C. A. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. In Re LEMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re A.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Prost v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In re I.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In re A.S.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re J.M.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API