Legal Opinion
Honkomp v. Dixon
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 14, 1981No. 80-1089PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos
Plaintiffs Gerald Honkomp and Nellie Honkomp brought an action to recover a $5,000 earnest money deposit. The money had been deposited with an escrowee, Gerald Murphy, under an agreement to purchase a residential property from defendants, Daniel J. Dixon and Linda C. Dixon. The real estate contract executed by the parties on May 3,1979, provided:
“This contract is subject to the purchaser (or broker on purchaser’s behalf) obtaining within 60 days a mortgage commitment in the amount of $49,000.00 or such lesser sum as purchaser accepts amortized by monthly payments over a period of not less…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Farwell Construction Co. v. TicktinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Rankin v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Barliant v. Follett Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roboserve, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation v. Kato Kagaku Company, Limited, a Japanese CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Dawdy v. SampleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Central National Bank v. Fleetwood Realty Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- J.B. Van Sciver Co. v. William Cooper Associates, Inc. (In Re J.B. Van Sciver Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Forman v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.