Legal Opinion
Roboserve, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation v. Kato Kagaku Company, Limited, a Japanese Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 6, 1996No. 95-1371PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
On August 4, 1992, Roboserve, Inc. (“Roboserve”), sued Kato Kagaku Co., Ltd. (“Kato”), claiming breach of contract, wrongful termination, and fraud. The parties went to trial on October 18, 1993 and the jury returned a verdict in Roboserve’s favor on all counts, awarding it compensatory and punitive damages totalling $9,950,000. Subsequently, Kato filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial or a remittitur. The district court agreed with Kato on certain technical points and granted a remittitur of $127,500, but otherwise upheld…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Mattyasovszky v. West Towns Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Jennie A. Mayer v. Gary Partners and Company, Limited, and K-Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Ampat/midwest, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Cross-Appellant, and Triangle Fastener Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Roboserve, Inc. v. Kato Kagaku Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Michael Johnson v. Jason DalkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Sanneman v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- SKF USA, INC. v. BjerknessDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.