Herrold v. Case
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint. This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ action.
The question, determinative of this decision, is whether the plaintiffs have capacity to maintain this action under .the facts alleged.
The facts, as we state them, appear in the complaint.
*913In the summer of 1950, the plaintiffs, husband and wife, each applied to defendant Jack Taylor, commissioner of public lands, for a lease on less than forty acres of certain land, lying below extreme low tide in the bed of navigable waters, to be used to plant and cultivate oysters.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- State Ex Rel. Gebhardt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Clithero v. ShowalterWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Allen v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vovos v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. McCaffreeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Herrold v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Vovos v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1976