Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Interstate Transit Lines

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1942No. 31418PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellis, District Judge.

This is a personal injury action which has once before been before this court. At thé first trial the plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment thereon was reversed “for errors in the instructions” and the cause remanded for a new trial. 139 Neb. 146, 296 N. W. 757.

Upon retrial the plaintiff again recovered a verdict and from judgment thereon the defendant has appealed. Upon the second trial much of the evidence was put in by stipulation and it may be said that the facts as set forth in the opinion above referred to are substantially reflected in the record now before…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lisle v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Steenbock v. Omaha Country ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Meyer v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Johnson v. MalloryNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Jarosh v. Van MeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kopecky v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Stark v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Styskal v. BrickeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API