Legal Opinion
Dunn & Mavis, Inc. v. Nu-Car Driveaway, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1982No. 81-1448PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff s-appellants, Dunn & Mavis, Inc., and its affiliates, providers of auto transport services in the Detroit metropolitan area from auto assembly plants to railheads and other distribution points, allege that defendant, Nu-Car Driveaway, Inc., a competitor, and its affiliates, conspired with Chrysler Motors to drive plaintiffs out of business. The conspirators allegedly achieved this end by replacing Dunn & Mavis with Nu-Car as sole transporter at the Warren, Michigan, Chrysler plant, knowing that the loss of Chrysler’s trans*243port business would destroy…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oreck Corporation v. Whirlpool Corporation and Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Hamilton C. Bushie and Doris Ann Bushie v. Stenocord CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gravity Inc v. Microsoft CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Rutman Wine Company v. E. & J. Gallo WineryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Westman Commission Company, Cross-Appellant v. Hobart International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.