Legal Opinion
Central Pines Land Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 20, 2010No. 98-314LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
This decision follows a trial on the plaintiffs’ claims of a Fifth Amendment taking without just compensation of their mineral servitude, known as “Group C,” in Vernon Parish, Louisiana. The mineral servitude involves land owned by the United States, occupied by Fort Polk and the Kisatehie National Forest. Many of the issues regarding ownership of the mineral servitude and the nature of the subject taking were resolved in earlier decisions by this court, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, and the United States Court of Appeals for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Resource Investments, Inc. and Land Recovery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Resource Investments v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014