Legal Opinion

Yeargin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 2, 1932No. A-8380PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed by the court at imprisonment for two years in the state reformatory at Granite.

Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

The state was compelled to rely upon circumstantial evidence. .Some one entered the Melrose Apartment House in Oklahoma City, and by opening a small closet door took therefrom a vacuum sweeper; defendant was seen and arrested in the alley at the rear of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Virden v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Lumpkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Trimmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Morrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Worchester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Yeager v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Byington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API