Legal Opinion

Virden v. Smith

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1922No. 2555PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*210By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

On the 20th day of July, 1918, the respondent, whose employers had accepted the provisions of an act of the legislature of this state known as the workmen’s compensation act (Stats. 1911, c. 111), sustained injuries in the course of his employment, which resulted in permanent and complete paralysis of both legs, from the hips downwards. On that date respondent’s employees notified the Nevada Industrial Commission of the accident and resulting injuries, which made an award to respondent of $50 per month, pursuant to the rate then fixed by said act for such cases. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Milliken v. SloatNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Talbot v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Sparks v. State Bank & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. American International Vacations v. MacBrideNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Nevada Industrial Commission v. PeckNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Beausoleil's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Coté v. Bachelder-Worcester Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API