Legal Opinion
Harp v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner, a female correction of*899ficer, filed three complaints of sexual discrimination with respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) while working at Auburn Correctional Facility. Following a hearing pursuant to Executive Law article 15, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that the New York State Department of Correctional Services (respondent) had discriminated against petitioner; that respondent retaliated against petitioner for filing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Imperial Diner, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- State Division of Human Rights v. MuiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- New York State Department of Correctional Services v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- New York State Department of Correctional Services v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kondracke v. BlueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Carrier Corp. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000