Legal Opinion

Dieterle v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1917No. 7073PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Rogers County ; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by Hattie Harris and others against C. W. Dieterle and others. Demurrer to petition overruled, and judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants, except Sanger, bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

POPE, G.

The parties will be designated as they appeared in the court below. This action was brought by the plaintiffs to cancel two oil and gas leases, one executed by the plaintiff Levi Higgin-botham to the defendants Dieterle, Strong, and Koenig, and the other executed by. Malinda Sloan, nee Higginbotham, to Dieterle and 'Sanger. Case was tried to the court, and judgment canceling lease executed by Levi Higginbotham to Dieterle and Sanger, from which judgment all the defendants prosecute error, except J. E. Sanger, who was made a defendant in error.

Tlie plaintiffs alleged in their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Tucker v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Bourland v. Madill State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elling v. Bank of JeffersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. O'Neill v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Hines v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Billy v. McGillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. RIVENBURG v. CILIBERTISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API