Legal Opinion

People v. Hartsell

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1973No. Crim. 5285PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AULT, J.

Defendant Jason Lee Hartsell was charged in a two-count information with assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)) and possession of a sawed-off shotgun (Pen. Code, § 12020). The information also alleged he used a firearm during the assault in violation of Penal Code section 12022.5 and that he had suffered two prior felony convictions for violating Penal Code section 12020.

After denial of his motion to set aside the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995, Hartsell admitted the two prior felony convictions and went to trial before a jury. He was found…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re CandelarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. ZackeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. DelgadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API