Legal Opinion

Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Witmer, J.

This appeal depends upon the meaning of "first party benefits” in article 18 of the Insurance Law (§§670-678), New York’s Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act, providing for no-fault insurance protection to "covered persons” and requires us to construe that law with particular reference to paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 671 thereof. Plaintiff has lost in excess of $1,000 per month in earnings since his motor vehicle accident on April 1, 1977, but defendant insurance carrier has paid him only 80% thereof, to wit, $800 per month. In this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Strain v. KechbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Companies v. BrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. PodolskyNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API