Legal Opinion

Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*841OPINION OF THE COURT

James B. Kane, J.

This action arises out of the February 20, 1980 decision of the Court of Appeals in Kurcsics v Merchant Mut. Ins. Co. (49 NY2d 451) wherein it was held that a covered person who has sustained a loss of earnings in excess of $1,000 per month is entitled to recover as first-party benefits 80% of his actual lost earnings up to a maximum recovery of $1,000 per month and not the $800 per month as directed by the New York State Department of Insurance. Kurcsics was awarded the $200 monthly difference plus 2% interest per month on the overdue amount and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Phillips v. Cahill Gordon & ReindelNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Larkin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In re the Arbitration between Gillead & City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API