Legal Opinion

Thomson v. City of Lewiston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2002No. 26881Published

1Opinion of the Court

50 P.3d 488 (2002)

137 Idaho 473

Brent THOMSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF LEWISTON; Urban Renewal, Agency, City of Lewiston, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 26881.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 2002 Term.

July 1, 2002.

Edwin L. Litteneker, Lewiston, for appellant.

Clements, Brown & McNichols, Lewiston, for respondent. Bentley G. Stromberg argued.

TROUT, Chief Justice.

I

NATURE OF THE CASE

This is an appeal from the district judge's dismissal based on lack of standing, of Appellant Brent Thomson's (Thomson) complaint seeking a declaratory judgment invalidating the City of Lewiston's (City) creation…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. William v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Young v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API