State v. Hamzy
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellees, Norflet Hamzy, Ralph Kuykendall, and Dana Kuykendall stand charged with keeping a gambling house. The police obtained telephone company records, relating to appellees’ telephone activities, by use of a prosecuting attorney’s subpoena rather than by use of a search warrant. With the information so gained, the police secured search warrants for the homes of two of the appellees and there seized gambling paraphernalia. The appellees filed a motion to suppress the evidence. The trial court granted the motion. The State filed this interlocutory appeal under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Davasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Gulley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Rainey v. HartnessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Starr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.