Legal Opinion

State v. Hamzy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1986No. CR 85-219PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellees, Norflet Hamzy, Ralph Kuykendall, and Dana Kuykendall stand charged with keeping a gambling house. The police obtained telephone company records, relating to appellees’ telephone activities, by use of a prosecuting attorney’s subpoena rather than by use of a search warrant. With the information so gained, the police secured search warrants for the homes of two of the appellees and there seized gambling paraphernalia. The appellees filed a motion to suppress the evidence. The trial court granted the motion. The State filed this interlocutory appeal under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Davasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Gulley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Rainey v. HartnessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Starr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API